I am John, I work for a company whose name I can not say and we have this client, but I am not allowed to mention their name, and we had this problem for which I cannot give specifics but I am here to tell you about how we implemented the solution.
Sounds familiar? Maybe, maybe not.
Well, for me this is the thing I hear at almost every conference I attend. Truth be told, I can understand that one can not give specifics, but one should also not start a topic meant to teach others unless you are willing to go into specifics.
I have the feeling that these “Jonhs” want to create the impression that they encountered a million problems and found at least one solution for each.
But how do I know that the problem was not created due to a faulty logic? How do we (the attendees) know if maybe the requirement was stated or understood in the wrong way. Usually that is where the problem stands. And it is best to ask all the questions before starting to work.
Anyhow, there are speakers for whom I would travel half the planet, but there are also others that have fancy job titles and do not have a clue of what’s going on in the dev world.
So, conference organizers: please, please I would rather see the same 3 speakers in all the conferences than having different poorly prepared speakers, just for the sake of not repeating.
And for the speakers: Please speak for the sake of sharing and making the community better not for the money. Remember why you became a programmer! If money is the first answer, you are doing it wrong.
Once upon a time, in April this year, I was moving to a new company. It looked really good especially since they said that they have “Nordic (Danish) management”. All good until end on July when I had some well-deserved vacation.
Continue reading “Petr (or how to lose a great developer in under 3 months)”
If you haven’t decorated you house yet or at least the Christmas Tree I (or better: Pantone) give you colour of the year 2018: Ultra Violet!.
In our project we have this Sentry integration that would let us know when something goes sideways (I am sure most devs know what I am talking about).
About a moth ago (all of devs and dev-ops) have missed one notification (we were all in a meeting an ignored the email) and live site was unusable.
Ever since I made a rule (for myself) to put the errors in a common Slack channel for all the devs to see. All good, no one was bugged.
A few days ago, Petr makes this announcement:
“Note – it seems that current errors from production are maybe false-positive and they are not affecting user. Sentry integration will be updated shortly.
Second note – even these errors may be false, we will still take a look into them.”
Today I see tow dozen errors in my email and I notify the devs, that maybe something went wrong, as there are too many different ones. If they are nothing than only 5 mins of our lives were lost.
To my notification I get this from Petr:
Yes, the FE errors on production were mentioned on stand-up and also in #frontend channel. They can be false positive, due to complications with Sentry integration.
There was no mention of said errors in any of the stand-ups this week or past week.
This morning, when I got into the office, I was surprised by my tester who said that none of the bugs I’ve put in for testing are fixed. Imagine my amazement when I checked the
bug-branch I was working on and the
testing-branch and they had very different code! So I go to Petr and:
Me: hey Petr, did you get any conflicts when merging the
bug-branch into the
Petr: Yes. But I fixed them. I kept the
Me: You should have kept the
bug-branch code as it was the newest one (and I added it to fix some bugs reported on the
Petr: Yes, yes. That is the one I used.
Half of the day has passed since and we still have different versions of code even though the
bug-branch was merged into the
testing-branch…Petr is on it (fixing).
I was saying that there is no possible way that a developer can be senior after only 2 years of experience. There is simply not enough time to meet the unexpected. And that is what, in my opinion, makes a senior: the unexpected. The ability to not be surprised and blocked. That is when a developer becomes senior.
There were of course voices that said that 2 years is more than enough. And it only depends on how passionate you are (how can passion be a factor in establishing seniority?). Then there was a slip from someone who said: if you convince your current employer to make you a senior, than you can put it in your CV and the next job recruiter would have to take you into account for a senior role. That made me think: hm.. sneaky one. So you you put it in your CV just for to market yourself? So the seniority became just a keyword? Who is to blame for this? Can we fix it?
About 3 years ago someone estimated that the number of programmers doubles every 5 years. I suppose then, there is this need of making oneself appear “seniorer” than the rest. But is it fair? and I mean it. There are senior developers with less than 2 years of experience and less than 25 years of life who participate in technical reviews during interviews (and I mean it because I have seen it) and they evaluate people that have more years of experience then they have of life, only to conclude that the respective developer is not good enough. I guess I am a bit afraid that I will one day be evaluated by one of these. And maybe I am more afraid of my reaction to it. I am afraid that I will try to impress this kid into hiring me. Is this ok? Is there something wrong with me? Are there any others like me?
I was recently invited to an interview for a frontend developer role. After the interviewer asked me a lot of questions about http, http2, devOps, linking backend with frontend he said: now let’s go to the more unpleasant questions. And he started with: what is this small tag at the beginning of an HTML page
<doctype... And he went on about DTD then we moved to local storage, then CSS and pre-processors …
When and why did HTML and CSS became unpleasant? how else would you develop for the web if not using HTML and CSS?
I am now asking you: people of the world that you call yourselves web developers, who are you and what did you do with the web developers?
This article exists because a tweet is to short and @ppk does not allow comments in his articles (i.e. this article: “What is a web developer?“). And maybe is a good thing that he does not allow comments – this gave me the opportunity to write down my thoughts without using other people’s space.
For about a year I moved from web development to application development (big mistake, will explain in a different post). And the same “developer problem” is present here too.
I believe this is because there are more and more people that call themselves developers [or even worse: web architects] and they don’t know the first thing about how the web works; they have no idea about what web standards are and why they exist.
Sadly most of them started their developer life – brace yourselves – programming in jQuery, or React or Elm (that’s the latest..). And I ask you now: how can one “program” in jQuery? When did jQuery become a programming language?
I tried saying these things out loud, but I got hit very hard by the young ones.
Maybe part of the problem is the wrong/too young [please read not enough life/work experienced] people in the high management or in the hiring process on the technical level (I know I saw this one too many times in a big corporation I used to work for).
What happened to people fighting for a better web? Are we just saying it to be trendy? What’s so trendy about not knowing the basics about doing your job? Why did you chose to be a web developer if you do not know what www is?
PS: I am not as old as the article sounds, but I am very sad about what I see around me. And maybe one article is not enough to change something, but I see it as a start. Maybe it will push some button on someone.
I read this article today: “Saying Goodbye to Firebug” and I remembered how me and Firebug first met. I thought it to be a good idea to write a few lines about it because Firebug was a good friend to say the least.
I remember the first time I saw Firebug. I was 2006, sometime at the beginning of the year (probably Jan or Feb). I was in the second year at the Faculty and it was the first session of a course called “Web techniques”. The first condition to pass the exam was to have Firefox and Firebug installed. No Firebug, no passing! You can not imagine what we all felt. How can a plug-in possibly help us! Little did we know…
And now, 11 years later, I a front end developer still using Firebug. To pass a different exam: the users acceptance.
I would like to thank you Firebug for all the help and support. You were there all the time for all the steps.
divs, for images and rounded corners, for transparency and animations. You helped a lot of people and brought up a bunch of great developers.
So thank you, friend.
First, Ionic is kind of stupid!
Now let’s make it smarter:
1. go to: /usr/local/lib/node_modules/ionic/node_modules/ionic-app-lib/lib/resources.js
2. change cacheImages property to false
3. remove android platform
4. re-add android platform
5. regenerate resources
Now Ionic is less stupid!
And in config.xml make sure the code is configured as follows:
<icon src="resources/android/icon/drawable-ldpi-icon.png" density="ldpi"/>
<splash src="resources/android/splash/drawable-port-xxxhdpi-screen.png" density="port-xxxhdpi"/>
<preference name="SplashScreen" value="screen"/>